Zardari and Zalmay Khalilzad Ties Questioned
|
The New York Times has published a news item relating to secret contact between Zalmay Khalilzad, American Ambassador to United Nations and Pakistan Presidential contender Asif Ali Zardari. Both were planning to meet on a personal level in Dubai in the coming few weeks. Since their secret contact was exposed, both cancelled the meeting. Now the best thing about all this is that Asif Zardari himself made the news public and that put his secret friend Zalmay Khalilzad in trouble. Numerous high ranking US officials responsible for this region confronted Zalmay Khalilzad for his back channel contacts as US wants to give an impression that it is neutral in all the political drama that it is staging in Pakistan through its agents. What a stupid idea on behalf of the American administration. This approach won’t clear their image from the minds of common people who all know it very well that Americans are always active in steering the political ship of Pakistan. It was they who brought PPP into the picture again and i won’t be surprised if sometime in future we came to know about possible link of CIA in the assassination of Benazir Bhutto to bring their guy on the power seat. New York Times Story can be found by clicking here
|
This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 26th, 2008 at 11:34 am and is filed under current affairs, world news . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The U.S. influence (bribery) has so permeated the Pakistani political process that there is no Pakistani political will at all, save to pursue American (neocon/Israeli) policies like 911 !! Many of the secret acts of the 911 false flag strike were done by the Pakistani takers of the CIA bribes……
Thomas i am not able to get a logical conclusion out of your comments. Can you kindly elaborate.
[...] This cup of tea was served by: Pro Pakistan [...]
In my newsblog of 21-Aug-2008 I referred to an article by Aslam Nassar in The Frontier Post which, amid all the excitement of Zadari’s candidacy, let slip “Zardari has also received green signal from U.S., Britain and leaders of European Union.” My comment about the article was “That pretty much says it all. It looks like one pro-Western stooge is destined to replace another - but Zadari doesn’t have the military and tactical background that Musharraf had, so my guess is that Pakistan’s security problems will increase significantly under his leadership.” I stand by my assessment.
i perceive ppp introduction as an english plot, not for no reason scotland yard was interested. Altho i don’t agree the english mostly suspect musharaf. My guess is benazir bet on the wrong horse when she thought pakistan was ready for her again, the resentment was to strong. perhaps that is naive. like 9-11 is a vague operation with apparently very many parties having a do, i wud however not be surprised if the same goes for the events in pakistan. Esp. the first attack i found extremely coincedentual, a thing that with me tends to indicate indeed cia/fbi interference. Last but not least it is known sharif was in the hospital on very short notice and checked benazirs livelessness himself.
Somehow , and i don’t know why you steer this up again, one might definetly wonder how musharaf resist autopsion and post mortem, perhaps he felt he had been steering up enough controverse already, yet i don’t agree. WHen we have to live with history like this, let’s at least make clear, obvious and transparant what are the facts that may later proof anything. sorry to say then but from the cia pov. pakistanis are to blame themselves for the lack of information they think is a justified taboo. (but we dont understand).
@Steve! I tend to agree with you on the fact that most of our leaders get a green signal from americans before they climb to the top posts. Thanks for your insight into the news. Your site has always been our favorite for global news insights.