<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Budget 2008-09 Pro Pakistan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pro-pakistan.com/2008/06/11/is-budget-2008-09-pro-pakistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pro-pakistan.com/2008/06/11/is-budget-2008-09-pro-pakistan/</link>
	<description>We discuss all about Pakistan!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: saleha jamal</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-pakistan.com/2008/06/11/is-budget-2008-09-pro-pakistan/#comment-4157</link>
		<dc:creator>saleha jamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-pakistan.com/?p=285#comment-4157</guid>
		<description>Altough the budget has many flaws but as far as i think the government these days is not interested in increasing the growth or aggregate demand. 

The first and foremost concern of gov. is to contain the inflation and in this regard they have revised the monetary policy and presented further tighting directives. As all economics students must know that making changes only in the monetary policy does not give fruitful effects but the fiscal policy should be in accordence with that. If they would have tightened the monetary policy and on the other hand would have showed an increase in aggregate demand by giving subsidies or by any other means, then the tight monetary policy would altough be effective for the short term but in the long run the inflation would have further risen.

For Pakistan the Threshold inflation rate is calculated at 9% and in order to achieve that growth should be slowed down in every means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Altough the budget has many flaws but as far as i think the government these days is not interested in increasing the growth or aggregate demand. </p>
<p>The first and foremost concern of gov. is to contain the inflation and in this regard they have revised the monetary policy and presented further tighting directives. As all economics students must know that making changes only in the monetary policy does not give fruitful effects but the fiscal policy should be in accordence with that. If they would have tightened the monetary policy and on the other hand would have showed an increase in aggregate demand by giving subsidies or by any other means, then the tight monetary policy would altough be effective for the short term but in the long run the inflation would have further risen.</p>
<p>For Pakistan the Threshold inflation rate is calculated at 9% and in order to achieve that growth should be slowed down in every means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Venray</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-pakistan.com/2008/06/11/is-budget-2008-09-pro-pakistan/#comment-3954</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Venray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-pakistan.com/?p=285#comment-3954</guid>
		<description>&#62; Sales tax raised to 16% from 15%
&#62; Import duty raised to 100% from 90% on luxury cars.
&#62; Import duty raised from 30% to 35% on 300 luxury items.

Increasing tax for a couple of hundred luxury import products hardly has any impact on macro economic behaviour, I guess the goal is to protect internal markets with those taxes.

But there are serious side effects in increasing tax that should not be taken lightly. Any economy student familiair with the work of John Maynard Keynes knows how tax changes greatly influence the behaviour, production and consumption of man. There's a lot to consider.

What I know from reading newspapers is that when the regular sales tax goes up with a percent (up to 16 %) it is likely that most prices will go up a little more higher than a percent (like up to 17,5 %). Shops will recalculate prices they tag their products with once tax increases, and that usually is a bit more than the tax increase. If you don't increase wages then extra sales tax will lead to less consumption, which could be seriously damaging to markets that are under pressure already. 

I was just wondering if in Pakistan there is only one sales tax percentage to apply? In my country we have three rates for sales tax:

0% - for trading abroad, foreign countries
6% - for food, healthcare, books
19% - for all other, regular sales tax

Where I live we will add another percent to the high rate next year too (change the 19% rate into a 20% rate). However, the lower rate remains the same (6%). That way all products that are needed for food and medicine do not change in price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Sales tax raised to 16% from 15%<br />
&gt; Import duty raised to 100% from 90% on luxury cars.<br />
&gt; Import duty raised from 30% to 35% on 300 luxury items.</p>
<p>Increasing tax for a couple of hundred luxury import products hardly has any impact on macro economic behaviour, I guess the goal is to protect internal markets with those taxes.</p>
<p>But there are serious side effects in increasing tax that should not be taken lightly. Any economy student familiair with the work of John Maynard Keynes knows how tax changes greatly influence the behaviour, production and consumption of man. There&#8217;s a lot to consider.</p>
<p>What I know from reading newspapers is that when the regular sales tax goes up with a percent (up to 16 %) it is likely that most prices will go up a little more higher than a percent (like up to 17,5 %). Shops will recalculate prices they tag their products with once tax increases, and that usually is a bit more than the tax increase. If you don&#8217;t increase wages then extra sales tax will lead to less consumption, which could be seriously damaging to markets that are under pressure already. </p>
<p>I was just wondering if in Pakistan there is only one sales tax percentage to apply? In my country we have three rates for sales tax:</p>
<p>0% - for trading abroad, foreign countries<br />
6% - for food, healthcare, books<br />
19% - for all other, regular sales tax</p>
<p>Where I live we will add another percent to the high rate next year too (change the 19% rate into a 20% rate). However, the lower rate remains the same (6%). That way all products that are needed for food and medicine do not change in price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waseem iqbal (from h.m.c taxila)</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-pakistan.com/2008/06/11/is-budget-2008-09-pro-pakistan/#comment-3717</link>
		<dc:creator>waseem iqbal (from h.m.c taxila)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-pakistan.com/?p=285#comment-3717</guid>
		<description>every year budget after implement when budget impliment every year not to bound to companey to pay their loabour to fixed govt but i want to this time govt to take positivly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>every year budget after implement when budget impliment every year not to bound to companey to pay their loabour to fixed govt but i want to this time govt to take positivly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZAB</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-pakistan.com/2008/06/11/is-budget-2008-09-pro-pakistan/#comment-3652</link>
		<dc:creator>ZAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-pakistan.com/?p=285#comment-3652</guid>
		<description>this is bullshit.  That pseudo-FM should go be sent to high school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is bullshit.  That pseudo-FM should go be sent to high school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telecom Sector Worst Hit by Budget 2008-09 &#124; Tea Break</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-pakistan.com/2008/06/11/is-budget-2008-09-pro-pakistan/#comment-3615</link>
		<dc:creator>Telecom Sector Worst Hit by Budget 2008-09 &#124; Tea Break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-pakistan.com/?p=285#comment-3615</guid>
		<description>[...] able to extract some facts about Budget here M. Junaid Khan Discusses some ins and outs of Budget here, PTA has collection of some data about Telecom’s contribution towards National Economy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] able to extract some facts about Budget here M. Junaid Khan Discusses some ins and outs of Budget here, PTA has collection of some data about Telecom’s contribution towards National Economy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telecom Sector Worst Hit by Budget 2008-09 &#124; ProPakistani</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-pakistan.com/2008/06/11/is-budget-2008-09-pro-pakistan/#comment-3610</link>
		<dc:creator>Telecom Sector Worst Hit by Budget 2008-09 &#124; ProPakistani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-pakistan.com/?p=285#comment-3610</guid>
		<description>[...] able to extract some facts about Budget here M. Junaid Khan Discusses some ins and outs of Budget here, PTA has collection of some data about Telecom’s contribution towards National Economy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] able to extract some facts about Budget here M. Junaid Khan Discusses some ins and outs of Budget here, PTA has collection of some data about Telecom’s contribution towards National Economy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Junaid Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-pakistan.com/2008/06/11/is-budget-2008-09-pro-pakistan/#comment-3574</link>
		<dc:creator>M Junaid Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-pakistan.com/?p=285#comment-3574</guid>
		<description>lol! nopes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol! nopes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qurat</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-pakistan.com/2008/06/11/is-budget-2008-09-pro-pakistan/#comment-3573</link>
		<dc:creator>Qurat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-pakistan.com/?p=285#comment-3573</guid>
		<description>Has budget ever been Pro Pakistan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has budget ever been Pro Pakistan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
